More reports from Daily Mail, The Sunday Times (WA) and The Sunday Times (UK)
When Leon Krasker died on the track between Denham and Herald Bight in Shark Bay in 1916, his widow Mathilde Krasker suddenly had to find a way to replace Leon’s income as a pearl trader.
Leon had left behind five children all in need of clothing, educating, feeding and housing, a family comprising George (aged 11), Georgette (aged 10), Marie (aged 8), Stephanie (aged 6) and Robert (aged 3).
No evidence has been left behind of how successful Leon’s pearl trading business had been just as no information is available as to how lucrative it might have been after Mathilde Krasker took it over, declaring it as her profession on several official and travel documents in subsequent years.
By the time the start of 1923 came around George was 17, Georgette was 16, Marie was 14, Stephanie was 12 and Robert was 9.
They were the children of parents who grew up speaking multiple languages – Mathilde with German and French, and Leon with Romanian and French – and the Krasker kids’ clearly non-English surname stood out against the mostly English-surnamed children amongst whom they learned, lived and played in Western Australia.
The five young Kraskers had been born into several countries with several different native languages – French, English and Strine – and needed decent education in two of those languages if they were to succeed in life within Australia and outside of it.
If George and Georgette had completed their formal education by late 1922 then they were in need of training for suitable professions and would that have been available in Denham at the time?
What further education and career training were suitable to meet Marie’s, Stephanie’s and Robert’s needs in Denham or Perth?
Leon and Mathilde had been educated in Paris and Leon had also trained there as a goldsmith, amongst extended family members who were jewellers and goldsmiths, tailors and furriers, so they knew the quality of the education that was available formally and informally amongst the arcades, galleries, museums, salons and streets of the French metropolis.
Further incentive to move back there may have already revealed itself in nine years-old Robert, a creative inclination that could hardly have been satisfied in Western Australia enough to turn it into a life-sustaining career there.
If Mathilde Krasker had planned on financing her family’s travel, sustenance and education with Leon’s legacy then she could not have foreseen it would be snatched away from her just after departing the port of Brisbane.
In his book Farbige Schatten – Der Kameramann Robert Krasker, Dr Falk Schwarz writes that Robert Krasker endured two life-shaping tragedies, his father’s death and falling ill with the malaria and type 1 diabetes that wrecked his health, shortened his career and lead to a premature death at the age of 67.
I suggest that the theft of the pearl necklace that Leon had bestowed to Mathilde was a third life-shaping tragedy, one that would have deeply affected them all, compounding tragedy upon tragedy and shaping all the Krasker children’s lives in ways they never deserved.
According to the CPI Inflation Calculator, “£1,000 in 1923 is equivalent in purchasing power to about £75,782.69 today, an increase of £74,782.69 over 101 years”, and in 2024 Australian dollars that is equivalent to $146,479.98.
Fact Checks
- “Mrs Krasker, a Rumanian …” – Mathilde Krasker was born in Chernivtsi in 1882 when it was located in Austria and thus she was Austrian at birth, and now her birthplace is in Ukraine. She was a naturalized Australian at the time of the theft.
- “a wealthy woman passenger …” – An assumption based on what exactly? That Mathilde Krasker had a pearl necklace and some US dollars in her possession before they were stolen?
- “a parcel of pearls, valued at £100, and 10 American 10-dollar gold pieces …” – Reports disagree on the contents and value of what was stolen so which newspaper’s reporter is more credible?
- “A pearl necklace, worth several hundreds of pounds …” – That is quite some difference between £100, £1000 and “several hundreds”.
- “Mrs Krasker’s husband, recently deceased, was pearling in this State for a time.” – If by “pearling” they mean diving for pearls then that is incorrect given he was a dealer in pearls and pearl shells for buttons, buying from pearling lugger captains to sell on the world market. Leon Krasker died in 1916 and the theft took place in 1923 so that “recently” equates to seven years.
- A parcel of pearls, a score in number, wrapped in a package, or a pearl necklace? – More disagreement about the facts between journalists and which of them is correct?